Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 8 results ...
Ahmadian, F F A, Rashidi, T H, Akbarnezhad, A and Waller, S T (2017) BIM-enabled sustainability assessment of material supply decisions. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(04), 668-95.
Ejohwomu, O A, Oshodi, O S and Lam, K C (2017) Nigeria’s construction industry: Barriers to effective communication. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(04), 652-67.
GhaffarianHoseini, A, Tien, D D, Naismith, N, Tookey, J and GhaffarianHoseini, A (2017) Amplifying the practicality of contemporary building information modelling implementations for New Zealand green building certification (green star). Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(04), 696-714.
Hu, X and Liu, C (2017) Total factor productivity measurement with carbon reduction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(04), 575-92.
Kazemi, R M, Riley, D, Asadi, S and Delgoshaei, P (2017) Improving the performance profile of energy conservation measures at the Penn State University Park campus. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(04), 610-28.
Panahi, B, Moezzi, E, Preece, C N and Wan, Z W N (2017) Value conflicts and organizational commitment of internal construction stakeholders. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(04), 554-74.
Parchami, J M and Shoar, S (2017) A hybrid SD-dematel approach to develop a delay model for construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(04), 629-51.
Rahmani, F, Maqsood, T and Khalfan, M (2017) An overview of construction procurement methods in Australia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(04), 593-609.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Australia; construction procurement; literature review; value for money; historical development; relationship-based procurement (rbp)
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2016-0058
- Abstract:
This paper reviews the use of various construction procurement systems in Australia suggesting that relationship-based procurement systems benefit all construction project participants but are unproved by many decision makers for public projects.